Card Checkmate

Written by Latest News SOS Ballot on June 10, 2011, 04:39 PM
Voters in four states head to the polls to preserve honest union elections.

Big Labor's dream to end secret ballots in union organizing elections has faded in the 111th Congress, but now the battle turns to the states. Citizens in Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah will vote on November 2 on ballot initiatives to block union "card check" elections in their states.

Card check laws are designed to replace elections with a system allowing a union to organize a work site if more than half of the employees sign a card approving the union. With less than 7.5% of private workers now wearing the union label, labor chiefs view card check as a way to give them a big new edge over management.

Workers often vote differently in private than they do in public. Unions typically wait until they have cards from more than 50% of employees before seeking to organize a work site or business. Management can then request a secret vote under current law. And in about one third of the cases in which secret ballot organizing elections are then held, unions fail to get a majority, according to the National Right to Work Foundation. Card check exposes workers and their families to peer pressure and union intimidation.

The four "save our secret ballot" initiatives on the November ballot, as they are called, would provide constitutional protection for secret ballot elections before a union is certified. The South Dakota proposal, for example, would amend the state constitution by stating that in union elections "the fundamental right of the individual to vote by secret ballot is guaranteed."

These measures have the added benefit of helping to keep businesses and jobs in these states. Private employment grew 3.7% in states with right-to-work laws in the last decade compared to a decline of 2.8% in states that have more favorable organizing laws, according to data from the National Right to Work Foundation. Think about the auto industry job losses in Michigan versus the auto job gains in Texas or Mississippi.

These state initiatives are a counterpoint to Big Labor's card check agenda in state capitals. Over the past decade or so, at least 10 states have passed card check measures for state and local public employees. In 2007, legislatures in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Oregon enacted card check laws that were signed by Democratic governors. In 2009 and 2010, similar bills were introduced in about a dozen other states. Victory for the "save our secret ballot" initiatives in November would slow the state card check campaign and inspire other states to build similar worker safeguards.

As for a national law, Democrats in Congress may make one last push in a lame duck session. They're under heavy union pressure to hold a vote, and their chief Senate spear carrier, Iowa's Tom Harkin, has said he wants to bring it to the floor. A sweep in favor of secret ballot protections in all four states in two weeks would send a message that Americans want to preserve their right to vote against a union without the risk of being ostracized—or worse.


Read the full story here.

Blog Comments

Julia
I would like to comment on the Gwyneth Paltrow YOU TUBE voetfromabroad. I don’t really care about the privileged Gwyneth and I REALLY don’t care about who she votes for, but I do care about the military overseas.They have been neglected in regards to voting. If Gwyneth actually cared about everyone voting, not just her candidate, she would try to help the military get a chance to vote.Read this and decide. I have checked the facts and theyr'e right on.WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Roy Blunt, the House Republican whip, on July 8 introduced a resolution demanding that the Defense Department better enable U.S. military personnel overseas to vote in the November elections. That act was followed by silence. Democrats normally leap on an opportunity to find fault with the Bush Pentagon. But not a single Democrat joined Blunt as a co-sponsor, and an all-Republican proposal cannot pass in the Democratic-controlled House. Analysis by the federal Election Assistance Commission, rejecting inflated Defense Department voting claims, estimated overseas and absentee military voting for the 2006 midterm elections at a disgracefully low 5.5 percent. The quality of voting statistics is so poor that there is no way to tell how many of the slightly over 330,000 votes actually were sent in by the absentee military voters and their dependents and how many by civilian Americans living abroad — 6 million all total.Nobody who has studied the question objectively sees any improvement since 2006, and that is a scandal. Retired U.S. Marine Corps Capt. Charles Henry wrote in the July issue of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings: “While virtually everyone involved … seems to agree that military people deserve at least equal opportunity when it comes to having their votes counted, indications are that in November 2008, many thousands of service members who try to vote will do so in vain.”So Gwyneth you be sure to vote!
rhkkswp
kMugVA <a href="http://tutilblnshtk.com/">tutilblnshtk</a>
ecbfoovmv
YUoeoR , [url=http://cmkfzpgsuspe.com/]cmkfzpgsuspe[/url], [link=http://upiwapjxxgdq.com/]upiwapjxxgdq[/link], http://lafzrdksycqg.com/
hyahnq
7VYWjI <a href="http://vteaapxotjse.com/">vteaapxotjse</a>
meszvs
bsCQKo , [url=http://amkhreqzhxyd.com/]amkhreqzhxyd[/url], [link=http://yfosspthqrat.com/]yfosspthqrat[/link], http://nhdtdvtzntkl.com/
buy wow gold
Hello my friend! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and come with approximately all significant infos. Iˇd like to look more posts like this . buy wow gold http://www.wow-gold-team.com

New Comment




simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)